[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4609707.AR30v8FONr@wuerfel>
Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2016 21:35:26 +0100
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
Kenneth Westfield <kwestfie@...eaurora.org>,
Kevin Hilman <khilman@...aro.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Revert "ASoC: qcom: Specify LE device endianness"
On Friday 12 February 2016 20:03:11 Mark Brown wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 08:48:58PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>
> > which all look like they are regmap_mmio users as well. Do they
> > suffer from the same problem?
>
> Probably, yes. It's only a problem if they're in systems that might
> otherwise run big endian successfully.
>
The affected clock drivers seem to include all the qcom platforms,
so I assumed that whatever platform uses sound/soc/qcom/lpass-cpu.c
has to use one of those as well. Same thing for drivers/nvmem/qfprom.c.
lpc32xx probably won't support big-endian.
syscon is probably fine because it only sets that flag based on the
"little-endian" DT property and I don't see anything setting that
(except the one platform that did so incorrectly).
Arnd
Powered by blists - more mailing lists