linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] [media] zl10353: use div_u64 instead of do

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.20.1602121634040.13632@knanqh.ubzr>
Date:	Fri, 12 Feb 2016 16:38:53 -0500 (EST)
From:	Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@...aro.org>
To:	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
cc:	Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@....samsung.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	Stefan Richter <stefanr@...6.in-berlin.de>,
	linux-media@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [media] zl10353: use div_u64 instead of do_div

On Fri, 12 Feb 2016, Arnd Bergmann wrote:

> On Friday 12 February 2016 13:21:33 Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> > This is all related to the gcc bug for which I produced a test case 
> > here:
> > 
> > http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.cross-arch/29801
> > 
> > Do you know if this is fixed in recent gcc?
> 
> I have a fairly recent gcc, but I also never got around to submit
> it properly.
> 
> However, I did stumble over an older patch I did now, which I could
> not remember what it was good for. It does fix the problem, and
> it seems to be a better solution.

WTF?

Hmmm... it apparently doesn't fix it if I apply this change to the gcc 
test case.


> diff --git a/include/linux/compiler.h b/include/linux/compiler.h
> index b5acbb404854..b5ff9881bef8 100644
> --- a/include/linux/compiler.h
> +++ b/include/linux/compiler.h
> @@ -148,7 +148,7 @@ void ftrace_likely_update(struct ftrace_branch_data *f, int val, int expect);
>   */
>  #define if(cond, ...) __trace_if( (cond , ## __VA_ARGS__) )
>  #define __trace_if(cond) \
> -	if (__builtin_constant_p((cond)) ? !!(cond) :			\
> +	if (__builtin_constant_p(!!(cond)) ? !!(cond) :			\
>  	({								\
>  		int ______r;						\
>  		static struct ftrace_branch_data			\
> 
>