[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAGo_u6r8-LJBWWrew0fV50Q+JnCxDj9PD57+9NoDm5TqCWL=jw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2016 16:30:50 -0600
From: Nishanth Menon <nm@...com>
To: Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>
Cc: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@...il.com>, Keerthy <j-keerthy@...com>,
Dmitry Lifshitz <lifshitz@...pulab.co.il>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
dt list <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-omap <linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>,
Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org>,
"ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk" <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm: dts: AM57XX: Correct the thermal thresholds
On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 4:23 PM, Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com> wrote:
> * Nishanth Menon <nm@...com> [160209 14:17]:
>> On 02/09/2016 04:09 PM, Eduardo Valentin wrote:
>> > On Mon, Feb 08, 2016 at 03:15:05PM +0530, Keerthy wrote:
>> >> The thermal threholds for am57xx are different from that of dra7.
>> >> Correcting the thresholds for the same.
>> >>
>> >> Signed-off-by: Keerthy <j-keerthy@...com>
>> >> ---
>> >>
>> >> Depends on: https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/2/8/90
>> >>
>> >> arch/arm/boot/dts/am57xx-beagle-x15.dts | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> >> 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+)
>> >>
>> >> Index: linux/arch/arm/boot/dts/am57xx-beagle-x15.dts
>> >> ===================================================================
>> >> --- linux.orig/arch/arm/boot/dts/am57xx-beagle-x15.dts 2016-02-08 14:57:05.514959101 +0530
>> >> +++ linux/arch/arm/boot/dts/am57xx-beagle-x15.dts 2016-02-08 14:57:05.510959168 +0530
>> >
>> > Sorry, did not bother to check, but is this the only user of am57xx?
>>
>> we will have AM57xx-IDK as well coming down the line. we already have
>> arch/arm/boot/dts/am57xx-cl-som-am57x.dts
>> arch/arm/boot/dts/am57xx-sbc-am57x.dts - not really sure what grade of
>> silicon are used in cl-SOM and sbc boards.
>
> Hmm can this one wait for v4.6 or is it critical for v4.5-rc
> cycle?
personally, I'd like to NAK this patch -> lack of reference
documentation, and guidance for various AM57xx boards in a generic
patch should probably be followed IMHO.
---
Regards,
Nishanth Menon
Powered by blists - more mailing lists