linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/4] Pass correct license string to MODULE

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sat, 13 Feb 2016 23:41:27 +0100
From:	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To:	William Breathitt Gray <vilhelm.gray@...il.com>
Cc:	Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@...il.com>,
	"linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] Pass correct license string to MODULE_LICENSE

On Tue, Feb 2, 2016 at 12:51 AM, William Breathitt Gray
<vilhelm.gray@...il.com> wrote:

> Several of the GPIO drivers have a copyright boilerplate lacking the "or
> later" verbiage regarding GPL compliant distribution. The MODULE_LICENSE
> string should reflect the actual copyright license terms used.
>
> William Breathitt Gray (4):
>   gpio: 104-dio-48e: Pass correct license string to MODULE_LICENSE
>   gpio: 104-idi-48: Pass the correct license string to MODULE_LICENSE
>   gpio: 104-idio-16: Pass the correct license string to MODULE_LICENSE
>   gpio: ws16c48: Pass the correct license string to MODULE_LICENSE

I squashed these four and applied. One "functional" change so just one commit.

Yours,
Linus Walleij