[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACRpkdaMho3eE9u3Lqqg0UBFBH-bo3d8LmO3y+HuyRQMBPKWYQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 13 Feb 2016 23:41:27 +0100
From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To: William Breathitt Gray <vilhelm.gray@...il.com>
Cc: Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@...il.com>,
"linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] Pass correct license string to MODULE_LICENSE
On Tue, Feb 2, 2016 at 12:51 AM, William Breathitt Gray
<vilhelm.gray@...il.com> wrote:
> Several of the GPIO drivers have a copyright boilerplate lacking the "or
> later" verbiage regarding GPL compliant distribution. The MODULE_LICENSE
> string should reflect the actual copyright license terms used.
>
> William Breathitt Gray (4):
> gpio: 104-dio-48e: Pass correct license string to MODULE_LICENSE
> gpio: 104-idi-48: Pass the correct license string to MODULE_LICENSE
> gpio: 104-idio-16: Pass the correct license string to MODULE_LICENSE
> gpio: ws16c48: Pass the correct license string to MODULE_LICENSE
I squashed these four and applied. One "functional" change so just one commit.
Yours,
Linus Walleij
Powered by blists - more mailing lists