lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAGb2v65FT-Kn4C3hno_FDcvbTkpow3FAnLLEUPz3y===d5YebQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Sat, 13 Feb 2016 10:28:51 +0800
From:	Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>
To:	Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com>
Cc:	Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>,
	Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
	Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>,
	linux-clk <linux-clk@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux-sunxi <linux-sunxi@...glegroups.com>,
	devicetree <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
	Vishnu Patekar <vishnupatekar0510@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] clk: sunxi: Fix APBS clock for Allwinner A80

Hi,

On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 5:31 PM, Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org> wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> This is v2 of the A80 APBS clock fixes series.
>
> When I did the A80 PRCM support, I failed to notice the A80's APBS clock
> was not the same as the A23's APB0 clock. The former is a zero-based
> divider, while the latter is a power-of-two divider. But the lowest 2
> dividers are the same.

It turns out that clk-sun8i-a23-apb0 was wrong. It's a zero-based divider,
not a power-of-two divider as the driver says. Thanks to Vishnu for pointing
it out. So NACK on this series.

I'll send a patch fixing this, but what should we do for old kernels?
I don't think backporting the CLK_OF_DECLARE changes is acceptable.
Maybe a stable patch based on the fix?

Sorry for the noise.

ChenYu

> The hardware defaults to the lowest setting, or a /1 divider. Since the
> child gates do not propagate clk_set_rate up, and no consumers here do
> clk_set_rate, this actually works.
>
> I realized my mistake while reviewing the A83T's PRCM patches. The A83T
> shares the same PRCM clocks as the A80.
>
> Maxime, since this was introduced in 4.5-rc1, please apply this series
> for 4.5 so we fix it before the release.
>
>
> Changes since v1:
>
>   - Replace the CLK_OF_DECLARE version of sun8i-a23-apb0-clk with the
>     A80 APBS version, instead of writing a new driver.
>
> Regards
> ChenYu
>
>
> Chen-Yu Tsai (2):
>   clk: sunxi: Add support for A80 APBS clock
>   ARM: dts: sun9i: Fix apbs clock compatible
>
>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/sunxi.txt |  1 +
>  arch/arm/boot/dts/sun9i-a80.dtsi                  |  2 +-
>  drivers/clk/sunxi/clk-sun8i-apb0.c                | 23 ++++++++---------------
>  3 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
>
> --
> 2.7.0
>

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ