lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160214110041.GB26920@leoy-linaro>
Date:	Sun, 14 Feb 2016 19:00:41 +0800
From:	Leo Yan <leo.yan@...aro.org>
To:	linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, Javi Merino <javi.merino@....com>,
	Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@...el.com>,
	Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@...il.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Regard of thermal power allocator's coefficients

Hi there,

I'm trying to upstreaming IPA patches for 96board Hikey, but so far
there have no standard DT binding for passing IPA coefficients for
power modeling.

So want to firstly to confirm if should we pass coefficients by using
device tree? Is someone working on related work for this?

Here has another more straightforward method is to directly to
include power model's coefficients in thermal sensor driver (such like
drivers/thermal/hisi_thermal.c), but my concern is this method will
include SoC specific data in the common thermal sensor driver,
so is this doable?

Welcome any suggestion.

Thanks,
Leo Yan

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ