[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20160214222223.002015058@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Sun, 14 Feb 2016 14:22:42 -0800
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org, Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu>
Subject: [PATCH 4.3 155/200] ext4: fix an endianness bug in ext4_encrypted_follow_link()
4.3-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>
commit 5a1c7f47da9b32d0671e776b0f388095b7f91e2e upstream.
applying le32_to_cpu() to 16bit value is a bad idea...
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
fs/ext4/symlink.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/fs/ext4/symlink.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/symlink.c
@@ -52,7 +52,7 @@ static const char *ext4_encrypted_follow
/* Symlink is encrypted */
sd = (struct ext4_encrypted_symlink_data *)caddr;
cstr.name = sd->encrypted_path;
- cstr.len = le32_to_cpu(sd->len);
+ cstr.len = le16_to_cpu(sd->len);
if ((cstr.len +
sizeof(struct ext4_encrypted_symlink_data) - 1) >
max_size) {
Powered by blists - more mailing lists