linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/3] tpm: Get rid of chip->pdev

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20160214080320.GC11156@intel.com>
Date:	Sun, 14 Feb 2016 10:03:20 +0200
From:	Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@...ux.intel.com>
To:	Jason Gunthorpe <jgunthorpe@...idianresearch.com>
Cc:	Stefan Berger <stefanb@...ibm.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Peter Huewe <peterhuewe@....de>,
	tpmdd-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] tpm: Get rid of chip->pdev

On Sat, Feb 13, 2016 at 11:57:24PM -0700, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 14, 2016 at 07:24:14AM +0200, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> > > This should take care of it for all drivers including vtpm.
> > > 
> > > https://github.com/jgunthorpe/linux/commits/for-jarkko
> > > 
> > > At the very least this turns silent use after free into a null pointer
> > > oops.
> > > 
> > > We should also discuss if we want to continue to have the driver
> > > module locked while /dev/tpmX is open, that is no longer needed for
> > > corectness.
> > 
> > I'm happy the patch that was sent before although I didn't give it
> > Reviewed-by because it had couple of style errors. If those two
> > style errors are the *only* issues I can fix up them.
> 
> This patch replaces the get/put_device patch entirely, if Stefan is
> happy with it we can just go ahead in this direction for 4.6
> 
> There was also a 0day build error on the devname patch, so the whole
> series will be reposted.

Perfect, thank you.

> Jason

/Jarkko