lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20160214222141.620045903@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:	Sun, 14 Feb 2016 14:20:44 -0800
From:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	stable@...r.kernel.org, Stefan Haberland <sth@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Keith Busch <keith.busch@...el.com>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Ming Lei <tom.leiming@...il.com>, Jens Axboe <axboe@...com>
Subject: [PATCH 4.4 007/117] block: fix bio splitting on max sectors

4.4-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Ming Lei <tom.leiming@...il.com>

commit d0e5fbb01a67e400e82fefe4896ea40c6447ab98 upstream.

After commit e36f62042880(block: split bios to maxpossible length),
bio can be splitted in the middle of a vector entry, then it
is easy to split out one bio which size isn't aligned with block
size, especially when the block size is bigger than 512.

This patch fixes the issue by making the max io size aligned
to logical block size.

Fixes: e36f62042880(block: split bios to maxpossible length)
Reported-by: Stefan Haberland <sth@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Keith Busch <keith.busch@...el.com>
Suggested-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Ming Lei <tom.leiming@...il.com>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@...com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>

---
 block/blk-merge.c |   26 +++++++++++++++++++-------
 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

--- a/block/blk-merge.c
+++ b/block/blk-merge.c
@@ -68,6 +68,18 @@ static struct bio *blk_bio_write_same_sp
 	return bio_split(bio, q->limits.max_write_same_sectors, GFP_NOIO, bs);
 }
 
+static inline unsigned get_max_io_size(struct request_queue *q,
+				       struct bio *bio)
+{
+	unsigned sectors = blk_max_size_offset(q, bio->bi_iter.bi_sector);
+	unsigned mask = queue_logical_block_size(q) - 1;
+
+	/* aligned to logical block size */
+	sectors &= ~(mask >> 9);
+
+	return sectors;
+}
+
 static struct bio *blk_bio_segment_split(struct request_queue *q,
 					 struct bio *bio,
 					 struct bio_set *bs,
@@ -79,6 +91,7 @@ static struct bio *blk_bio_segment_split
 	unsigned front_seg_size = bio->bi_seg_front_size;
 	bool do_split = true;
 	struct bio *new = NULL;
+	const unsigned max_sectors = get_max_io_size(q, bio);
 
 	bio_for_each_segment(bv, bio, iter) {
 		/*
@@ -88,20 +101,19 @@ static struct bio *blk_bio_segment_split
 		if (bvprvp && bvec_gap_to_prev(q, bvprvp, bv.bv_offset))
 			goto split;
 
-		if (sectors + (bv.bv_len >> 9) >
-				blk_max_size_offset(q, bio->bi_iter.bi_sector)) {
+		if (sectors + (bv.bv_len >> 9) > max_sectors) {
 			/*
 			 * Consider this a new segment if we're splitting in
 			 * the middle of this vector.
 			 */
 			if (nsegs < queue_max_segments(q) &&
-			    sectors < blk_max_size_offset(q,
-						bio->bi_iter.bi_sector)) {
+			    sectors < max_sectors) {
 				nsegs++;
-				sectors = blk_max_size_offset(q,
-						bio->bi_iter.bi_sector);
+				sectors = max_sectors;
 			}
-			goto split;
+			if (sectors)
+				goto split;
+			/* Make this single bvec as the 1st segment */
 		}
 
 		if (bvprvp && blk_queue_cluster(q)) {


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ