linux-kernel - [PATCH 3/9] cpufreq: governor: Fix nice contribution computation in dbs_check

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4591302.DXuxEtjCGY@vostro.rjw.lan>
Date:	Mon, 15 Feb 2016 02:15:50 +0100
From:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
To:	Linux PM list <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>
Cc:	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
	Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@....com>
Subject: [PATCH 3/9] cpufreq: governor: Fix nice contribution computation in dbs_check_cpu()

From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>

The contribution of the CPU nice time to the idle time in dbs_check_cpu()
is computed in a bogus way, as the code may subtract current and previous
nice values for different CPUs.

That doesn't matter for cases when cpufreq policies are not shared,
but may lead to problems otherwise.

Fix the computation and simplify it to avoid taking unnecessary steps.

Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
---
 drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.c |   18 +++---------------
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)

Index: linux-pm/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.c
===================================================================
--- linux-pm.orig/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.c
+++ linux-pm/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.c
@@ -198,22 +198,10 @@ void dbs_check_cpu(struct cpufreq_policy
 		j_cdbs->prev_cpu_idle = cur_idle_time;
 
 		if (ignore_nice) {
-			struct cpu_dbs_info *cdbs = gov->get_cpu_cdbs(cpu);
-			u64 cur_nice;
-			unsigned long cur_nice_jiffies;
+			u64 cur_nice = kcpustat_cpu(j).cpustat[CPUTIME_NICE];
 
-			cur_nice = kcpustat_cpu(j).cpustat[CPUTIME_NICE] -
-					 cdbs->prev_cpu_nice;
-			/*
-			 * Assumption: nice time between sampling periods will
-			 * be less than 2^32 jiffies for 32 bit sys
-			 */
-			cur_nice_jiffies = (unsigned long)
-					cputime64_to_jiffies64(cur_nice);
-
-			cdbs->prev_cpu_nice =
-				kcpustat_cpu(j).cpustat[CPUTIME_NICE];
-			idle_time += jiffies_to_usecs(cur_nice_jiffies);
+			idle_time += cputime_to_usecs(cur_nice - j_cdbs->prev_cpu_nice);
+			j_cdbs->prev_cpu_nice = cur_nice;
 		}
 
 		if (unlikely(!wall_time || wall_time < idle_time))