[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1455512997.16012.24.camel@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2016 16:09:57 +1100
From: Balbir Singh <bsingharora@...il.com>
To: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
benh@...nel.crashing.org, paulus@...ba.org, mpe@...erman.id.au,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@...hsingularity.net>,
"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3] powerpc/mm: Fix Multi hit ERAT cause by recent THP
update
> Now we can't depend for mm_cpumask, a parallel find_linux_pte_hugepte
> can happen outside that. Now i had a variant for kick_all_cpus_sync that
> ignored idle cpus. But then that needs more verification.
>
> http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ports.ppc.embedded/81105
Can be racy as a CPU moves from non-idle to idle
In
> + pmd_hugepage_update(vma->vm_mm, address, pmdp, ~0UL, 0);
> + /*
> + * This ensures that generic code that rely on IRQ disabling
> + * to prevent a parallel THP split work as expected.
> + */
> + kick_all_cpus_sync();
pmdp_invalidate()->pmd_hugepage_update() can still run in parallel with
find_linux_pte_or_hugepte() and race.. Am I missing something?
Balbir Singh
Powered by blists - more mailing lists