[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAMuHMdVUXH-_PB+DNuCbTTXD6Zmy4iG9i=-ame4PDVAOKv2tvQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2016 09:46:05 +0100
From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc: "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Vladimir Murzin <vladimir.murzin@....com>,
Victor Kamensky <victor.kamensky@...aro.org>,
Nicolas Pitre <nico@...aro.org>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Laura Abbott <labbott@...oraproject.org>,
Chris Brandt <Chris.Brandt@...esas.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] ARM: mm: mark section-aligned portion of rodata NX
On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 10:45 AM, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de> wrote:
> On Thursday 11 February 2016 18:00:32 Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
>> On Fri, Jan 22, 2016 at 01:19:03PM -0800, Kees Cook wrote:
>> > On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 10:38 AM, Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org> wrote:
>> > > On Mon, Dec 7, 2015 at 11:47 PM, Ard Biesheuvel
>> > > <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org> wrote:
>> > >> On 7 December 2015 at 23:35, Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org> wrote:
>> > >>> /*
>> > >>> + * Without CONFIG_DEBUG_ALIGN_RODATA, __start_rodata_section_aligned will
>> > >>> + * be the first section-aligned location after __start_rodata. Otherwise,
>> > >>> + * it will be equal to __start_rodata.
>> > >>> + */
>> > >>> +__start_rodata_section_aligned = ALIGN(__start_rodata, 1 << SECTION_SHIFT);
>> ...
>>
>> I'm afraid this causes build errors on two configurations:
>>
>> ./arch/arm/kernel/vmlinux.lds:701: undefined symbol `SECTION_SHIFT' referenced in expression
>>
>> which I think is down to the new __start_rodata_section_aligned line.
>>
>> Olof's builder errored out with this for both allnoconfig and
>> lpc18xx_defconfig builds. Both probably due to CONFIG_MMU being
>> unset, and hence no definition for SECTION_SHIFT.
>>
>> I think you need to make this conditional on CONFIG_MMU.
>
> I've hit another problem with this patch, when using XIP_KERNEL, I now see
>
> arch/arm/mm/built-in.o:(.data+0x4bc): undefined reference to `__start_rodata_section_aligned'
>
> in linux-next, apparently because of the combination with "ARM: 8513/1: xip: Move
> XIP linking to a separate file".
Is this due to the copy not taking into account the recent changes to
vmlinux.lds.S?
"git show 538bf4694898b19e" with copy-rename detection shows:
copy from arch/arm/kernel/vmlinux.lds.S
copy to arch/arm/kernel/vmlinux-xip.lds.S
index a6e395c53a48e045..6f59ef290289e078 100644
--- a/arch/arm/kernel/vmlinux.lds.S
+++ b/arch/arm/kernel/vmlinux-xip.lds.S
[...]
@@ -117,7 +114,7 @@ SECTIONS
ARM_CPU_KEEP(PROC_INFO)
}
-#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_ALIGN_RODATA
+#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_RODATA
. = ALIGN(1<<SECTION_SHIFT);
#endif
RO_DATA(PAGE_SIZE)
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@...ux-m68k.org
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
Powered by blists - more mailing lists