lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160215100415.GD10826@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
Date:	Mon, 15 Feb 2016 10:04:15 +0000
From:	Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>
To:	Uwe Kleine-König 
	<u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>
Cc:	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
Subject: Re: arm qemu test failures due to 'driver-core: platform: probe
 of-devices only using list of compatibles'

On Mon, Feb 15, 2016 at 10:14:06AM +0100, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> Hello Russell,
> 
> On Mon, Feb 15, 2016 at 08:58:18AM +0000, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 15, 2016 at 09:17:50AM +0100, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> > > On Sun, Feb 14, 2016 at 08:07:55PM +0000, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> > > > On Sun, Feb 14, 2016 at 08:55:01PM +0100, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> > > > > So the unexpected abnormality here is that even though this device is
> > > > > instantiated by dt, the driver doesn't provide any compatibles.
> > > > > Either my expectation is wrong, then 67d02a1bbb33455 should be reverted
> > > > 
> > > > Your expectation is wrong.  AMBA primecell devices have hardware IDs
> > > > and are matched to their drivers by those IDs.  Just like PCI.
> > > 
> > > pci devices don't appear in dt, do they? I don't see the connection
> > > between amba devices and platform devices, see my other mail in this
> > > thread for some more details.
> > 
> > They both have hardware IDs, and they are both matched via those hardware
> > IDs.
> 
> I changed platform_match which is about matching by dt compatible, acpi
> and/or device name. I don't see how this can affect an amba device given
> they match to a driver by a hardware id.
> 
> > Your change has introduced a regression and is therefore wrong.
> 
> I'd like to understand though why and how my commit is wrong to be able
> to fix it instead of getting it reverted.

I don't have the commit, and I haven't seen the patch so I can't
comment further, sorry.

-- 
RMK's Patch system: http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line: currently at 9.6Mbps down 400kbps up
according to speedtest.net.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ