[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHc6FU69k2uRXjSSS+9K0cXzFs74DPsz6DDv8GN=hmh7RpPA-Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2016 12:35:14 +0100
From: Andreas Gruenbacher <agruenba@...hat.com>
To: "Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)" <mtk.manpages@...il.com>
Cc: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@...ldses.org>,
linux-ext4 <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>,
XFS Developers <xfs@....sgi.com>,
lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux NFS Mailing List <linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-cifs@...r.kernel.org, Linux API <linux-api@...r.kernel.org>,
Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Anna Schumaker <anna.schumaker@...app.com>,
Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@...marydata.com>,
Jeff Layton <jlayton@...chiereds.net>,
Andreas Dilger <adilger@...ger.ca>
Subject: Re: richacl(7) man page review comments
On Mon, Feb 15, 2016 at 11:25 AM, Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)
<mtk.manpages@...il.com> wrote:
> You're right. I was confusing with xattr(7). So, I think it might
> make some sense to eventually move both of these into man-pages (for
> richacl(7), at least, it's probably worth delaying this for a bit),
> since they're describing kernel-user-space interfaces.
Well, the actual user-space interface is xattrs in both cases.
> I can see counter-arguments too, such as these pages are closely
> related to the corresponding user-space libraries you maintain.
> What do you think?
I would keep the man-pages where they are right now, but I don't have
a strong preference.
Andreas
Powered by blists - more mailing lists