linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/4] mailbox: mailbox-test: support single channel with separate Tx and Rx buffer

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 15 Feb 2016 12:38:30 +0000
From:	Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>
To:	Jassi Brar <jassisinghbrar@...il.com>
Cc:	Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>,
	Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
	Devicetree List <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] mailbox: mailbox-test: support single channel with
 separate Tx and Rx buffer



On 15/02/16 12:31, Jassi Brar wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 15, 2016 at 5:47 PM, Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com> wrote:
>> Hi Jassi,
>>
>> On 11/02/16 17:13, Sudeep Holla wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Lee, Jassi,
>>>
>>> Assuming mailbox-test was designed to be generic, I am trying to extend
>>> it to support single channel with separate Tx and Rx buffer. With these
>>> changes I am able to test arm_mhu driver. However I couldn't understand
>>> the intention of converting buffer to ASCII hex dump in read method.
>>> I have a local change to remove that so that it can deal with any data
>>> in any format(e.g. some protocol format) and userspace can deal with the
>>> actual interpretation of the data. Let me know your thoughts on that.
>>>
>>
>> Can you review this ? It would be good to get this in for v4.6
>>
> Seems simple enough. So once you and Lee are in sync...
>

That was quick :). Anyways IIUC Lee agrees with most of the changes.

The question I am asking is not part of this series, I didn't make the
change to remove hexdump yet, I am trying to understand the reasoning
for doing that and also explaining my requirement as why I want to
remove it.

-- 
Regards,
Sudeep