lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Mon, 15 Feb 2016 23:24:22 +0900
From:	Joonsoo Kim <js1304@...il.com>
To:	Xishi Qiu <qiuxishi@...wei.com>
Cc:	Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>,
	zhong jiang <zhongjiang@...wei.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
	Aaron Lu <aaron.lu@...el.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
	Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
	David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linux Memory Management List <linux-mm@...ck.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] mm/compaction: speed up pageblock_pfn_to_page()
 when zone is contiguous

2016-02-15 19:06 GMT+09:00 Xishi Qiu <qiuxishi@...wei.com>:
> On 2016/2/15 10:42, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
>
>>>
>>> I have a question about the zone continuity. because hole exists at
>>> arbitrary position in a page block. Therefore, only pageblock_pf_to_page()
>>> is insufficiency, whether pageblock aligned pfn or not , the pfn_valid_within()
>>> is necessary.
>>>
>>> eh: 120M-122M is a range of page block, but the 120.5M-121.5M is holes, only by
>>> pageblock_pfn_to_page() to conclude in the result is inaccurate
>>
>> contiguous may be misleading word. It doesn't represent there are no
>> hole. It only represents that all pageblocks within zone span belong to
>> corresponding zone and validity of all pageblock aligned pfn is
>> checked. So, if it is set, we can safely call pfn_to_page() for pageblock
>> aligned pfn in that zone without checking pfn_valid().
>>
>> Thanks.
>>
>
> Hi Joonsoo,
>
> So "contiguous" here only means that struct page is exist, and don't care whether
> the memory is exist, right?

Yes.

Thanks.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ