linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 3.12 00/64] 3.12.54-stable review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 15 Feb 2016 16:20:21 +0100
From:	Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz>
To:	Shuah Khan <shuahkh@....samsung.com>, stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	linux@...ck-us.net, shuah.kh@...sung.com,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, tomas.winkler@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3.12 00/64] 3.12.54-stable review

On 02/11/2016, 08:26 PM, Shuah Khan wrote:
> On 02/11/2016 06:59 AM, Jiri Slaby wrote:
>> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.12.54 release.
>> There are 64 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
>> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
>> let me know.
>>
>> Responses should be made by Mon Feb 15 14:54:53 CET 2016.
>> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>>
>> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
>> 	http://kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/jirislaby/stable-review/patch-3.12.54-rc1.xz
>> and the diffstat can be found below.
>>
> 
> Compiled and booted on my test system. I did see
> one additional error message:
> 
> mei_me 0000:00:16.0: version message write failed
> 
> Anything to be concerned about?

I hope not, given there are no relevant changes in mei in this release.
Ccing MEI maintainer if this rings a bell?

thanks,
-- 
js
suse labs