linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 3.10 00/64] 3.10.97-stable review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <56C1F2BA.7090209@roeck-us.net>
Date:	Mon, 15 Feb 2016 07:46:02 -0800
From:	Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
To:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
	shuah.kh@...sung.com, patches@...nelci.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3.10 00/64] 3.10.97-stable review

On 02/14/2016 02:22 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.10.97 release.
> There are 64 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Tue Feb 16 22:22:07 UTC 2016.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>

Build results:
	total: 122 pass: 120 fail: 2
Failed builds:
	i386:allyesconfig
	x86_64:allyesconfig

Qemu test results:
	total: 72 pass: 72 fail: 0

Details are available at http://kerneltests.org/builders.

As mentioned separately, dropping 'EVM: Use crypto_memneq() for digest
comparison' should fix the problem.

Guenter