lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2016 21:43:30 +0530 From: Keerthy <a0393675@...com> To: Nishanth Menon <nm@...com>, Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com> CC: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@...il.com>, Keerthy <j-keerthy@...com>, Dmitry Lifshitz <lifshitz@...pulab.co.il>, "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, dt list <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, linux-omap <linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>, Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>, Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org>, "ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk" <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com> Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm: dts: AM57XX: Correct the thermal thresholds On Monday 15 February 2016 09:19 PM, Nishanth Menon wrote: > On 02/14/2016 10:27 PM, Keerthy wrote: >> >> >> On Saturday 13 February 2016 04:11 AM, Tony Lindgren wrote: >>> * Nishanth Menon <nm@...com> [160212 14:32]: >>>> On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 4:23 PM, Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com> wrote: >>>>> * Nishanth Menon <nm@...com> [160209 14:17]: >>>>>> On 02/09/2016 04:09 PM, Eduardo Valentin wrote: >>>>>>> On Mon, Feb 08, 2016 at 03:15:05PM +0530, Keerthy wrote: >>>>>>>> The thermal threholds for am57xx are different from that of dra7. >>>>>>>> Correcting the thresholds for the same. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Keerthy <j-keerthy@...com> >>>>>>>> --- >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Depends on: https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/2/8/90 >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> arch/arm/boot/dts/am57xx-beagle-x15.dts | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++++ >>>>>>>> 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+) >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Index: linux/arch/arm/boot/dts/am57xx-beagle-x15.dts >>>>>>>> =================================================================== >>>>>>>> --- linux.orig/arch/arm/boot/dts/am57xx-beagle-x15.dts 2016-02-08 14:57:05.514959101 +0530 >>>>>>>> +++ linux/arch/arm/boot/dts/am57xx-beagle-x15.dts 2016-02-08 14:57:05.510959168 +0530 >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Sorry, did not bother to check, but is this the only user of am57xx? >>>>>> >>>>>> we will have AM57xx-IDK as well coming down the line. we already have >>>>>> arch/arm/boot/dts/am57xx-cl-som-am57x.dts >>>>>> arch/arm/boot/dts/am57xx-sbc-am57x.dts - not really sure what grade of >>>>>> silicon are used in cl-SOM and sbc boards. >>>>> >>>>> Hmm can this one wait for v4.6 or is it critical for v4.5-rc >>>>> cycle? >>>> >>>> personally, I'd like to NAK this patch -> lack of reference >>>> documentation, and guidance for various AM57xx boards in a generic >>>> patch should probably be followed IMHO. >>> >>> OK let's wait for that then. >> >> OK. I will send a v2 with better documentation. > > > > This data is in the AM572x datasheet: > http://www.ti.com/lit/ds/symlink/am5728.pdf > > Table 5-3 in the current version contains the maximum junction > temperatures. > > this indicates that there are "Commercial" and "extended" -> we may > need to introduce just 2 dtsis -> am57xx-commercial and > am57xx-extended and reuse those based on the part on the board. just a > suggestion.. Or use the minimum of the 2 to be on the safer side if we have to deal with one dtsi? Regards, Keerthy > >
Powered by blists - more mailing lists