linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 5/5] Staging: rtl8188eu/core: make core more readable

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1455553619.3091.9.camel@cvidal.org>
Date:	Mon, 15 Feb 2016 17:26:59 +0100
From:	Colin Vidal <colin@...dal.org>
To:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc:	"open list:STAGING SUBSYSTEM" <devel@...verdev.osuosl.org>,
	open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 5/5] Staging: rtl8188eu/core: make core more readable

On Sun, 2016-02-14 at 16:39 -0800, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 07:05:53PM +0100, Colin Vidal wrote:
> > Signed-off-by: Colin Vidal <colin@...dal.org>
> > ---
> >  drivers/staging/rtl8188eu/core/rtw_iol.c | 10 +++-------
> >  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8188eu/core/rtw_iol.c
> > b/drivers/staging/rtl8188eu/core/rtw_iol.c
> > index 2e2145c..ba6c492 100644
> > --- a/drivers/staging/rtl8188eu/core/rtw_iol.c
> > +++ b/drivers/staging/rtl8188eu/core/rtw_iol.c
> > @@ -18,11 +18,7 @@
> >  
> >  bool rtw_IOL_applied(struct adapter *adapter)
> >  {
> > -	if (adapter->registrypriv.fw_iol == 1)
> > -		return true;
> > -
> > -	if ((adapter->registrypriv.fw_iol == 2) &&
> > -	    (!adapter_to_dvobj(adapter)->ishighspeed))
> > -		return true;
> > -	return false;
> > +	return adapter->registrypriv.fw_iol == 1 ||
> > +		(adapter->registrypriv.fw_iol == 2 &&
> > +		 !adapter_to_dvobj(adapter)->ishighspeed);
> >  }
> 
> I'm sorry, but this patch does not do what you said it does, it's
> much
> harder to read now :(
> 
> Also, I can't take a patch without a changelog text :(
> 
> thanks,
> 
> greg k-h

Hi Greg,

Thanks for you replie!

OK, I thought it was a better idea (as suggests Joe Perches) to group
the test in a way to avoid multiples - and maybe confusing - returns.
So, I'll remove this one.

Sorry about the changelot, I missed it while making patch series, I'll
resend it.

Thanks,

Colin