linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 3.10 00/64] 3.10.97-stable review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20160215181209.GC7927@kroah.com>
Date:	Mon, 15 Feb 2016 10:12:09 -0800
From:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:	Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, shuah.kh@...sung.com,
	patches@...nelci.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3.10 00/64] 3.10.97-stable review

On Sun, Feb 14, 2016 at 09:20:18PM -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On 02/14/2016 02:22 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> >This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.10.97 release.
> >There are 64 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> >to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> >let me know.
> >
> >Responses should be made by Tue Feb 16 22:22:07 UTC 2016.
> >Anything received after that time might be too late.
> >
> 
> More early feedback: Patch 'EVM: Use crypto_memneq() for digest comparisons'
> should be dropped because crypto_memneq() does not exist in v3.10.
> 
> This causes a build error in x86_64:allyesconfig and i386:allyesconfig.
> 
> security/integrity/evm/evm_main.c: In function 'evm_verify_hmac':
> security/integrity/evm/evm_main.c:132:3: error:
> 	implicit declaration of function 'crypto_memneq'

Now deleted, thanks.

greg k-h