[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160215200201.GN3696@two.firstfloor.org>
Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2016 21:02:01 +0100
From: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Alok Kataria <akataria@...are.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
Anil S Keshavamurthy <anil.s.keshavamurthy@...el.com>,
Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
Bernd Petrovitsch <bernd@...rovitsch.priv.at>,
linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org, Pedro Alves <palves@...hat.com>,
Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>,
Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>,
Michal Marek <mmarek@...e.cz>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...il.com>,
Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>,
Waiman Long <Waiman.Long@....com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz>, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
x86@...nel.org, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Chris Wright <chrisw@...s-sol.org>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@...ana.be>,
David Vrabel <david.vrabel@...rix.com>,
live-patching@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>,
Gleb Natapov <gleb@...nel.org>,
Matt Fleming <matt@...eblueprint.co.uk>,
Chris J Arges <chris.j.arges@...onical.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>,
Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@...ibm.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/33] Compile-time stack metadata validation
> > There are two ways to fix the warnings:
> >
> > 1. get rid of the thunks and call the C functions directly; or
>
> No. Not until gcc learns about per-function callibg conventions (so that it can
> be marked as not clobbering registers).
It does already for static functions in 5.x (with -fipa-ra).
And with LTO it can be used even somewhat globally.
Even older version supported it, for only for x86->SSE on 32bit, which
is useless for the kernel. But the new IPA-RA propagates which registers
are clobbered.
That said it will probably be a long time until we can drop support for
older compilers. So for now the manual method is still needed.
-Andi
Powered by blists - more mailing lists