[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160216143728.61372efa@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2016 14:37:28 +1100
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Cc: linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Krzysztof Adamski <krzysztof.adamski@...to.com>
Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the gpio tree with the pinctrl tree
Hi Linus,
Today's linux-next merge of the gpio tree got a conflict in:
drivers/pinctrl/sunxi/pinctrl-sunxi.c
between commit:
be2d107f4433 ("pinctrl: sunxi: Use pin number when calling sunxi_pmx_set")
from the pinctrl tree and commit:
6cee3821e4e4 ("gpio/pinctrl: sunxi: stop poking around in private vars")
from the gpio tree.
I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary (no action
is required).
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
diff --cc drivers/pinctrl/sunxi/pinctrl-sunxi.c
index 96f64a104a62,3e95bfe66a06..000000000000
--- a/drivers/pinctrl/sunxi/pinctrl-sunxi.c
+++ b/drivers/pinctrl/sunxi/pinctrl-sunxi.c
@@@ -457,9 -457,8 +457,9 @@@ static int sunxi_pinctrl_gpio_get(struc
struct sunxi_pinctrl *pctl = gpiochip_get_data(chip);
u32 reg = sunxi_data_reg(offset);
u8 index = sunxi_data_offset(offset);
- u32 set_mux = pctl->desc->irq_read_needs_mux &&
- test_bit(FLAG_USED_AS_IRQ, &chip->desc[offset].flags);
+ bool set_mux = pctl->desc->irq_read_needs_mux &&
+ gpiochip_line_is_irq(chip, offset);
+ u32 pin = offset + chip->base;
u32 val;
if (set_mux)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists