[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160216053827.GX19486@dastard>
Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2016 16:38:28 +1100
From: Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>
To: "Nag Avadhanam (nag)" <nag@...co.com>
Cc: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>,
"Daniel Walker (danielwa)" <danielwa@...co.com>,
Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
"Khalid Mughal (khalidm)" <khalidm@...co.com>,
"xe-kernel@...ernal.cisco.com" <xe-kernel@...ernal.cisco.com>,
"dave.hansen@...el.com" <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
"hannes@...xchg.org" <hannes@...xchg.org>,
"riel@...hat.com" <riel@...hat.com>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
"linux-doc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kernel: fs: drop_caches: add dds drop_caches_count
On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 02:58:04AM +0000, Nag Avadhanam (nag) wrote:
> Its the calculation of the # of bytes of non-reclaimable file system cache
> pages that has been troubling us. We do not want to count inactive file
> pages (of programs/binaries) that were once mapped by any process in the
> system as reclaimable because that might lead to thrashing under memory
> pressure (we want to alert admins before system starts dropping text
> pages).
The code presented does not match your requirements. It only counts
pages that are currently mapped into ptes. hence it will tell you
that once-used and now unmapped binary pages are reclaimable, and
drop caches will reclaim them. hence they'll need to be fetched from
disk again if they are faulted in again after a drop_caches run.
Cheers,
Dave.
--
Dave Chinner
david@...morbit.com
Powered by blists - more mailing lists