[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160216102328.GB3902@pd.tnic>
Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2016 11:23:28 +0100
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>
Cc: x86@...nel.org, Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@...hat.com>,
Stas Sergeev <stsp@...t.ru>,
Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...il.com>,
Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@...allels.com>,
Brian Gerst <brgerst@...il.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/4] x86: sigcontext fixes, again
On Mon, Feb 15, 2016 at 06:38:12PM -0800, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> This is take 2 at fixing x86 64-bit signals wrt SS. After a lot of
> thought, this is not controlled by any flags -- I would much prefer
> to avoid opt-in behavior. Instead, it just tries hard to avoid
> triggering the cases that break DOSEMU.
>
> Stas, this now seems to pass the test you sent me. It works with
> stock dosemu2 (I haven't tested classic dosemu because I can't get it
> to work regardless). It also works with a patched dosemu2 that bypasses
> the userspace trampoline:
>
> https://github.com/amluto/dosemu2/commit/571b4d08dc885b7a133e444a2ad23e0d21366206
>
> With this applied, all of the x86 selftests pass on x86_64. That
> wasn't the case before -- ldt_gdt_64 was broken.
>
> This is a bit risky, and another option would be to do nothing at
> all. Then we'd disable the problematic self-tests (sigh), and
> DOSEMU and similar tools will be stuck using gross hacks even on new
> kernels.
>
> Changes from v3:
> - Comment fixes from Borislav.
> - Improve AR_xyz comments to better match SDM. (Borislav, is this good?)
Yep, nice.
Thanks!
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
ECO tip #101: Trim your mails when you reply.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists