[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160216103028.GA10730@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2016 16:00:30 +0530
From: Kamalesh Babulal <kamalesh@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Torsten Duwe <duwe@....de>
Cc: Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>,
Balbir Singh <bsingharora@...il.com>,
Jessica Yu <jeyu@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>, live-patching@...r.kernel.org,
Miroslav Benes <mbenes@...e.cz>, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 8/8] livepatch: Detect offset for the ftrace location
during build
* Torsten Duwe <duwe@....de> [2016-02-16 09:23:02]:
> On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 11:17:02AM +0530, Kamalesh Babulal wrote:
> > * Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com> [2016-02-12 17:45:17]:
> > > int test(int a)
> > > {
> > > + printk("%d\n", a);
> > > return ++a;
> > > }
> >
> > Thanks. This workaround, helped to load sample livepatch module.
>
> N.b.: if you try to livepatch/trace such a leaf function without
> global dependencies, it will crash if that function got called with
> a different TOC value. Hence this whole testing.
>
I am running out of ideas on how to generate this crash, any pointers
will be helpful.
> You may alternatively try my gcc patch ;-)
Thank you. I will give the patch a try.
Regards,
Kamalesh
Powered by blists - more mailing lists