linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH] GPIO/ACPI: DesignWare: Add GPIO-signaled ACPI events support for power button

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <56C316E8.4090002@huawei.com>
Date:	Tue, 16 Feb 2016 20:32:40 +0800
From:	Jiang Qiu <qiujiang@...wei.com>
To:	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
	Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>
CC:	Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@...il.com>,
	"linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
	ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	<linuxarm@...wei.com>, <haifeng.wei@...wei.com>,
	<charles.chenxin@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] GPIO/ACPI: DesignWare: Add GPIO-signaled ACPI events
 support for power button

在 2016/2/16 2:25, Linus Walleij 写道:
> Mika can you help out looking at this patch. Tell me if you need a copy
> of the whole patch, I'm not smart with ACPI.
> 
> On Fri, Feb 5, 2016 at 7:25 AM, qiujiang <qiujiang@...wei.com> wrote:
> 
>> This patch modifies the DesignWare GPIO controller driver to
>> support the GPIO-signaled ACPI Events. This is used for power
>> button function on ARM server.
>>
>> To make it work, the _AEI and _EVT object must be defined in
>> the corresponding GPIO driver's dsdt table in UEFI. At the same
>> time, ACPI daemon component is also necessary.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: qiujiang <qiujiang@...wei.com>
> 
> (...)
>> --- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-dwapb.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-dwapb.c
>> @@ -23,6 +23,11 @@
>>  #include <linux/spinlock.h>
>>  #include <linux/platform_data/gpio-dwapb.h>
>>  #include <linux/slab.h>
>> +#include <linux/acpi.h>
>> +#include <linux/gpio.h>
> 
> You should only need <linux/driver.h>
Here, I don't understand well. I used driver.h instead acpi.h and
gpio.h, but it came to compile failed.
> 
>> +#include "gpiolib.h"
> 
> I guess this is for some acpi_gpiochip* functions that ACPI GPIO
> drivers need like this:
> 
Yes, this is for function the following acpi_gpiochip* function.
These functions were declared in the gpiolib.h but gpiolib-acpi.h.
>> +       /* Add GPIO-signaled ACPI event support */
>> +       if (pp->irq)
>> +               acpi_gpiochip_request_interrupts(&(port->bgc.gc));
> 
> Hm, maybe these should be in "gpiolib-acpi.h" or so.
> 
> Overall the patch looks sane to me, but I need some ACPI
> person to tell.
> 
> Yours,
> Linus Walleij
> 
> .
>