linux-kernel - Should I report UBSAN Undefined behaviour warnings?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <alpine.LRH.2.20.1602161603310.24671@math.ut.ee>
Date:	Tue, 16 Feb 2016 16:05:21 +0200 (EET)
From:	Meelis Roos <mroos@...ux.ee>
To:	Linux Kernel list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Should I report UBSAN Undefined behaviour warnings?

I have turned on UBSAN on multiple test machines to see what it's like 
and it gives me multiple kinds of warnings from multiple places in code.

What's the status of UBSAN - should I report them or not yet?

-- 
Meelis Roos (mroos@...ux.ee)