[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160216154829.GE17690@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2016 12:48:29 -0300
From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <arnaldo.melo@...il.com>
To: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv3 5/5] perf tools: Add perf data cache feature
Em Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 12:29:36PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo escreveu:
> Em Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 04:01:43PM +0100, Jiri Olsa escreveu:
> > + caches = zalloc(sizeof(struct cache_level) * cnt);
> > + if (!caches)
> > + return -1;
> > +
> > + for (i = 0; i < cnt; i++) {
> > + struct cache_level c;
> > +
> > + #define _R(v) \
> > + if (readn(fd, &c.v, sizeof(u32)) != sizeof(u32))\
> > + return -1; \
>
> So in this case that 'caches' variable leaks?
>
Ok, I fixed this and did the rename to cpu_cache_level, tested and
merged it, going to the next patchkit.
Thanks! Useful feature, we should use it in other places, like: record
same workload in different machines, say Ivy Bridge and Broadwell, do
'perf diff' and see the CPU cache topology difference in addition to
other symbolic, per DSO, etc diffs.
- Arnaldo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists