[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACRpkdb3nKTEDCvafURhKRPJipJ=K_y1oyE_kKc=-T8E=Bai0g@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2016 16:51:57 +0100
From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc: "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Russell King <rmk+kernel@....linux.org.uk>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@...il.com>,
"linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] gpio: ep93xx: remove private irq_to_gpio function
On Mon, Feb 15, 2016 at 4:46 PM, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de> wrote:
> The ep93xx goes through its own back-and-forth dance every time
> it wants to know the gpio number for an irq line, when it really
> just hardcodes a fixed offset in ep93xx_gpio_to_irq().
>
> This removes the pointless macro and replaces the conversion inside
> of the driver with simple add/subtract operations, using an
> explicit macro.
>
> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
(...)
> -#include <linux/gpio/driver.h>
> -/* FIXME: this is here for gpio_to_irq() - get rid of this! */
> #include <linux/gpio.h>
No, what you want to get rid of is the #include <linux/gpio.h> not the
<linux/gpio/driver.h>, we want to be more specific. Sorry for putting the
comment wrong.
> @@ -35,6 +31,7 @@ void __iomem *ep93xx_gpio_base; /* FIXME: put this into irq_data */
> #define EP93XX_GPIO_LINE_MAX 63
>
> /* maximum value for irq capable line identifiers */
> +#define EP93XX_GPIO_IRQ_BASE 64
> #define EP93XX_GPIO_LINE_MAX_IRQ 23
This doesn't apply to my tree :O
My EP93XX_GPIO_LINE_MAX_IRQ is in
arch/arm/mach-ep93xx/include/mach/gpio-ep93xx.h
So I think you must be having another patch somewhere in the ARM SoC
tree. (I can take it, just send it along with an update of this one.)
Yours,
Linus Walleij
Powered by blists - more mailing lists