lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160216160859.GE19432@atomide.com>
Date:	Tue, 16 Feb 2016 08:08:59 -0800
From:	Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>
To:	Pali Rohár <pali.rohar@...il.com>
Cc:	Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
	Nishanth Menon <nm@...com>, Pavel Machel <pavel@....cz>,
	Aaro Koskinen <aaro.koskinen@....fi>,
	Sebastian Reichel <sre@...nel.org>,
	Ivaylo Dimitrov <ivo.g.dimitrov.75@...il.com>,
	Lorenzo Pieralisi <Lorenzo.Pieralisi@....com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-omap@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] omap3: Add cpuidle parameters table for omap3430

* Pali Rohár <pali.rohar@...il.com> [160216 02:09]:
> On Tuesday 16 February 2016 11:01:43 Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> > On 02/15/2016 07:02 PM, Pali Rohár wrote:
> > >Based on CPU type choose generic omap3 or omap3430 specific cpuidle
> > >parameters. Parameters for omap3430 were measured on Nokia N900 device and
> > >added by commit 5a1b1d3a9efa ("OMAP3: RX-51: Pass cpu idle parameters")
> > >which were later removed by commit 231900afba52 ("ARM: OMAP3: cpuidle -
> > >remove rx51 cpuidle parameters table") due to huge code complexity.
> > >
> > >This patch brings cpuidle parameters for omap3430 devices again, but uses
> > >simple condition based on CPU type.
> > >
> > >Signed-off-by: Pali Rohár <pali.rohar@...il.com>
> > >Fixes: 231900afba52d6faddfb480cde4132d4edc089bc
> > >---
> > 
> > Acked-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>
> 
> Tony, Nishanth (or somebody else...) can you test this patch on more
> omap3 devices to check if it does not break existing cpuidle code?

Seems to work for me on a ldp, which is GP 3430 ES3.0.

Regards,

Tony

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ