[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160216201151.GH1380@ti.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2016 14:11:51 -0600
From: Benoit Parrot <bparrot@...com>
To: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@....samsung.com>
CC: <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@....fi>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@....samsung.com>,
Bryan Wu <cooloney@...il.com>,
Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>,
<linux-media@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] [media] v4l2-async: Don't fail if registered_async
isn't implemented
Tested-by: Benoit Parrot <bparrot@...com>
Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@....samsung.com> wrote on Tue [2016-Feb-16 17:03:21 -0300]:
> After sub-dev registration in v4l2_async_test_notify(), the v4l2-async
> core calls the registered_async callback but if a sub-dev driver does
> not implement it, v4l2_subdev_call() will return a -ENOIOCTLCMD which
> should not be considered an error.
>
> Reported-by: Benoit Parrot <bparrot@...com>
> Signed-off-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@....samsung.com>
>
> ---
>
> Changes in v2:
> - Check the return of v4l2_subdev_call (Benoit).
>
> drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-async.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-async.c b/drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-async.c
> index 716bfd47daab..a4b224d92572 100644
> --- a/drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-async.c
> +++ b/drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-async.c
> @@ -120,7 +120,7 @@ static int v4l2_async_test_notify(struct v4l2_async_notifier *notifier,
> }
>
> ret = v4l2_subdev_call(sd, core, registered_async);
> - if (ret < 0) {
> + if (ret < 0 && ret != -ENOIOCTLCMD) {
> if (notifier->unbind)
> notifier->unbind(notifier, sd, asd);
> return ret;
> --
> 2.5.0
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists