[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4579617.rz6Yi2sU5M@phil>
Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2016 07:45:09 +0100
From: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>
To: Jianqun Xu <jay.xu@...k-chips.com>
Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>, robh+dt@...nel.org,
pawel.moll@....com, mark.rutland@....com,
ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk, galak@...eaurora.org,
jwerner@...omium.org, huangtao@...k-chips.com,
linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] spi/rockchip: Add dt-binding for Rockchip rk3399 spi
Hi Jianqun,
Am Mittwoch, 17. Februar 2016, 08:21:58 schrieb Jianqun Xu:
> 在 16/02/2016 22:37, Heiko Stuebner 写道:
> > Am Dienstag, 16. Februar 2016, 13:22:23 schrieb Mark Brown:
> >> On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 05:22:18PM +0800, jianqun.xu wrote:
> >>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/spi-rockchip.txt | 1 +
> >>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> >>
> >> I'd expect this to be added to both the driver and the binding document
> >> not just the document.
> >
> > It seems the driver can still use the rk3066-variant - aka nobody has
> > found specific issues in the rk3399 IP implementation.
> >
> > Having the more specific IP names already in the dts before actually
> > using them was suggested by devicetree people to not have to exchange
> > everything once specific issues were found.
> >
> > So right now it's using the fallback-mechanism of binding to the rk3066
> > name, but if some obstacle appears it will only take adding the binding
> > in the driver to make it work (even with old devicetrees).
>
> Thank you, got it, and I will re-send this patch with the driver patch.
you have me confused now :-) .
That was meant as a reply to Mark's comment, explaining why the double
compatible and the driver only binding to the rk3066-one right now.
Heiko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists