[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LNX.2.00.1602170932180.17370@pobox.suse.cz>
Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2016 09:34:20 +0100 (CET)
From: Miroslav Benes <mbenes@...e.cz>
To: Jessica Yu <jeyu@...hat.com>
cc: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>,
Seth Jennings <sjenning@...hat.com>,
Jiri Kosina <jikos@...nel.org>,
Vojtech Pavlik <vojtech@...e.com>,
Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>,
Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, live-patching@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5] ftrace/module: remove ftrace module notifier
On Tue, 16 Feb 2016, Jessica Yu wrote:
> Remove the ftrace module notifier in favor of directly calling
> ftrace_module_enable() and ftrace_release_mod() in the module loader.
> Hard-coding the function calls directly in the module loader removes
> dependence on the module notifier call chain and provides better
> visibility and control over what gets called when, which is important
> to kernel utilities such as livepatch.
>
> This fixes a notifier ordering issue in which the ftrace module notifier
> (and hence ftrace_module_enable()) for coming modules was being called
> after klp_module_notify(), which caused livepatch modules to initialize
> incorrectly. This patch removes dependence on the module notifier call
> chain in favor of hard coding the corresponding function calls in the
> module loader. This ensures that ftrace and livepatch code get called in
> the correct order on patch module load and unload.
>
> Fixes: 5156dca34a3e ("ftrace: Fix the race between ftrace and insmod")
> Signed-off-by: Jessica Yu <jeyu@...hat.com>
> Reviewed-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
> Reviewed-by: Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.cz>
> Acked-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
Reviewed-by: Miroslav Benes <mbenes@...e.cz>
Miroslav
Powered by blists - more mailing lists