[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <201602171933.HFD51078.LOSFVMFQFOJHOt@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>
Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2016 19:33:07 +0900
From: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.SAKURA.ne.jp>
To: mhocko@...nel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Cc: rientjes@...gle.com, mgorman@...e.de, oleg@...hat.com,
torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, hughd@...gle.com, andrea@...nel.org,
riel@...hat.com, linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 4/6] mm,oom: exclude oom_task_origin processes if they are OOM-unkillable.
>>From 4924ca3031444bfb831b2d4f004e5a613ad48d68 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.SAKURA.ne.jp>
Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2016 16:35:12 +0900
Subject: [PATCH 4/6] mm,oom: exclude oom_task_origin processes if they are OOM-unkillable.
oom_scan_process_thread() returns OOM_SCAN_SELECT when there is a
thread which returns oom_task_origin() == true. But it is possible
that that thread is marked as OOM-unkillable.
This patch changes oom_scan_process_thread() not to select it
if it is marked as OOM-unkillable.
Signed-off-by: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.SAKURA.ne.jp>
---
mm/oom_kill.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/mm/oom_kill.c b/mm/oom_kill.c
index b0c327d..ebc6764 100644
--- a/mm/oom_kill.c
+++ b/mm/oom_kill.c
@@ -308,7 +308,8 @@ enum oom_scan_t oom_scan_process_thread(struct oom_control *oc,
* If task is allocating a lot of memory and has been marked to be
* killed first if it triggers an oom, then select it.
*/
- if (oom_task_origin(task) && !test_tsk_thread_flag(task, TIF_MEMDIE))
+ if (oom_task_origin(task) && !test_tsk_thread_flag(task, TIF_MEMDIE) &&
+ task->signal->oom_score_adj != OOM_SCORE_ADJ_MIN)
return OOM_SCAN_SELECT;
return OOM_SCAN_OK;
--
1.8.3.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists