linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 4/4] ASoC: simple-card: Support for selecting system clocks by ID

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20160217120759.GO7544@sirena.org.uk>
Date:	Wed, 17 Feb 2016 12:07:59 +0000
From:	Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:	Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@...com>
Cc:	Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
	Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>,
	Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
	alsa-devel@...a-project.org, Jyri Sarha <jsarha@...com>,
	linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"Kristo, Tero" <t-kristo@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] ASoC: simple-card: Support for selecting system
 clocks by ID

On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 10:13:35AM +0200, Peter Ujfalusi wrote:

> With this change we don't need to write custom machine drivers for setup not
> using sysclk_id == 0.
> I do think this is reasonable change by itself.

> However I do think that the current simple-card is flawed regarding to clock
> selection and the change Jyri and me are proposing is reasonable.

But you define a new ABI to specify it in the process, I'd rather fix
the flaws by using the common clock ABI than extend any device stuff.
If it didn't define a new ABI I'd probably not worry about it but one of
the issues we have with DT is that we do end up making ABIs every time
we put something in DT.

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (474 bytes)