[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1455713251.5622.9.camel@linux.intel.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2016 14:47:31 +0200
From: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@...ux.intel.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
Cc: Intel graphics driver community testing & development
<intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
Linux kernel development <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
David Hildenbrand <dahi@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
"Gautham R. Shenoy" <ego@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Chris Wilson <chris@...is-wilson.co.uk>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [RFC] kernel/cpu: Use lockref for online CPU reference
counting
On ti, 2016-02-16 at 12:07 +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 12:51:03PM +0200, Joonas Lahtinen wrote:
> > Quoting my original patch;
> >
> > "See the Bugzilla link for more details.
>
> If its not in the Changelog it doesn't exist. Patches should be self
> contained and not refer to external sources for critical information.
The exact locking case in CPUfreq drivers causing a splat is described
in the patch. Details were already included, that's why term "more
details" was used.
This is not exactly taking us closer to a fix, so I'd rather like to
discuss about the possibility of adding one more member to task_struct.
I added Oleg as CC to catch his attention to re-evaluate based on the
previous discussion in this thread.
Regards, Joonas
--
Joonas Lahtinen
Open Source Technology Center
Intel Corporation
Powered by blists - more mailing lists