linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/3] usb: type-c: USB Type-C Connector System Software Interface

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1455717104.7626.20.camel@suse.com>
Date:	Wed, 17 Feb 2016 14:51:44 +0100
From:	Oliver Neukum <oneukum@...e.com>
To:	Felipe Balbi <balbi@...nel.org>
Cc:	balbif@...il.com,
	Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com>,
	Mathias Nyman <mathias.nyman@...ux.intel.com>,
	Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-usb@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] usb: type-c: USB Type-C Connector System Software
 Interface

On Wed, 2016-02-17 at 15:34 +0200, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> Oliver Neukum <oneukum@...e.com> writes:
> >> > The API to user space. That is the point. We cannot break user space.
> >> > Once this sysfs API is upstream we are stuck with it.
> >> 
> >> yeah, in fact I have been wondering if sysfs is the best interface to
> >
> > That is the discussion we must have.
> >
> >> userspace. I talked with Heikki a few days back about this; I was
> >> wondering if something like what the NFC folks did with netlink would be
> >> better here.
> >
> > I doubt that, because the main user is likely to be udev scripts.
> 
> I'm entirely sure about this. I think it's not too far-fetched to think

What exactly are you sure about about?

> that, eventually, we will need an actual stack exposed for the CC pin.

The raw CC pin? What about the timing requirement?

	Regards
		Oliver