linux-kernel - [PATCH v2] mm,oom: don't abort on exiting processes when selecting a victim.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1455719485-7730-1-git-send-email-penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>
Date:	Wed, 17 Feb 2016 23:31:25 +0900
From:	Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.SAKURA.ne.jp>
To:	mhocko@...nel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Cc:	rientjes@...gle.com, mgorman@...e.de, oleg@...hat.com,
	torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, hughd@...gle.com, andrea@...nel.org,
	riel@...hat.com, linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.SAKURA.ne.jp>,
	Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>
Subject: [PATCH v2] mm,oom: don't abort on exiting processes when selecting a victim.

Currently, oom_scan_process_thread() returns OOM_SCAN_ABORT when there is
a thread which is exiting. But it is possible that that thread is blocked
at down_read(&mm->mmap_sem) in exit_mm() called from do_exit() whereas
one of threads sharing that memory is doing a GFP_KERNEL allocation
between down_write(&mm->mmap_sem) and up_write(&mm->mmap_sem)
(e.g. mmap()).

----------
T1                  T2
                    Calls mmap()
Calls _exit(0)
                    Arrives at vm_mmap_pgoff()
Arrives at do_exit()
Gets PF_EXITING via exit_signals()
                    Calls down_write(&mm->mmap_sem)
                    Calls do_mmap_pgoff()
Calls down_read(&mm->mmap_sem) from exit_mm()
                    Calls out of memory via a GFP_KERNEL allocation but
                    oom_scan_process_thread(T1) returns OOM_SCAN_ABORT
----------

down_read(&mm->mmap_sem) by T1 is waiting for up_write(&mm->mmap_sem) by
T2 while oom_scan_process_thread() by T2 is waiting for T1 to set
T1->mm = NULL. Under such situation, the OOM killer does not choose
a victim, which results in silent OOM livelock problem.

This patch changes oom_scan_process_thread() not to return OOM_SCAN_ABORT
when there is a thread which is exiting.

Signed-off-by: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.SAKURA.ne.jp>
Signed-off-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>
---
 mm/oom_kill.c | 3 ---
 1 file changed, 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/mm/oom_kill.c b/mm/oom_kill.c
index cf87153..6e6abaf 100644
--- a/mm/oom_kill.c
+++ b/mm/oom_kill.c
@@ -292,9 +292,6 @@ enum oom_scan_t oom_scan_process_thread(struct oom_control *oc,
 	if (oom_task_origin(task))
 		return OOM_SCAN_SELECT;

-	if (task_will_free_mem(task) && !is_sysrq_oom(oc))
-		return OOM_SCAN_ABORT;
-
 	return OOM_SCAN_OK;
 }

-- 
1.8.3.1