[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <56C4A60D.30709@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2016 17:55:41 +0100
From: Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>
To: John Crispin <blogic@...nwrt.org>
Cc: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
Henry Chen <henryc.chen@...iatek.com>,
Thierry Reding <treding@...dia.com>,
Flora Fu <flora.fu@...iatek.com>,
Steven Liu <steven.liu@...iatek.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V5 04/11] soc: mediatek: PMIC wrap: split SoC specific
init into callback
On 14/02/16 22:01, John Crispin wrote:
>
>
> On 11/02/2016 12:54, Matthias Brugger wrote:
>>> diff --git a/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pmic-wrap.c
>>> b/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pmic-wrap.c
>>> index b22b664..e3bbee5 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pmic-wrap.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pmic-wrap.c
>>> @@ -372,6 +372,7 @@ struct pmic_wrapper_type {
>>> enum pwrap_type type;
>>> u32 arb_en_all;
>>> int (*init_reg_clock)(struct pmic_wrapper *wrp);
>>> + int (*init_special)(struct pmic_wrapper *wrp);
>>
>> Nit:
>> I wonder if we can find a better name for the callback, as init_special
>> sounds quite generic to me.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Matthias
>
> Hi,
>
> At first I considered enable_wrapper as the mt8135/8173 code seems to do
> just that. however mt2701 does an init of the ADC. So how about using
> init_soc_specific ?
>
sounds good :)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists