lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1455736496-374-2-git-send-email-rkrcmar@redhat.com>
Date:	Wed, 17 Feb 2016 20:14:43 +0100
From:	Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@...hat.com>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	kvm@...r.kernel.org, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
	Yuki Shibuya <shibuya.yk@...s.nec.co.jp>
Subject: [PATCH v2 01/14] KVM: x86: change PIT discard tick policy

Discard policy uses ack_notifiers to prevent injection of PIT interrupts
before EOI from the last one.

This patch changes the policy to always try to deliver the interrupt,
which makes a difference when its vector is in ISR.
Old implementation would drop the interrupt, but proposed one injects to
IRR, like real hardware would.

The old policy breaks legacy NMI watchdogs, where PIT is used through
virtual wire (LVT0): PIT never sends an interrupt before receiving EOI,
thus a guest deadlock with disabled interrupts will stop NMIs.

Note that NMI doesn't do EOI, so PIT also had to send a normal interrupt
through IOAPIC.  (KVM's PIT is deeply rotten and luckily not used much
in modern systems.)

Even though there is a chance of regressions, I think we can fix the
LVT0 NMI bug without introducing a new tick policy.

Cc: <stable@...r.kernel.org>
Reported-by: Yuki Shibuya <shibuya.yk@...s.nec.co.jp>
Signed-off-by: Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@...hat.com>
---
 v2: resolve dependencies to make it the first patch

 arch/x86/kvm/i8254.c | 12 +++++++-----
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/i8254.c b/arch/x86/kvm/i8254.c
index b0ea42b78ccd..ab5318727579 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/i8254.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/i8254.c
@@ -245,7 +245,7 @@ static void kvm_pit_ack_irq(struct kvm_irq_ack_notifier *kian)
 		 * PIC is being reset.  Handle it gracefully here
 		 */
 		atomic_inc(&ps->pending);
-	else if (value > 0)
+	else if (value > 0 && ps->reinject)
 		/* in this case, we had multiple outstanding pit interrupts
 		 * that we needed to inject.  Reinject
 		 */
@@ -288,7 +288,9 @@ static void pit_do_work(struct kthread_work *work)
 	 * last one has been acked.
 	 */
 	spin_lock(&ps->inject_lock);
-	if (ps->irq_ack) {
+	if (!ps->reinject)
+		inject = 1;
+	else if (ps->irq_ack) {
 		ps->irq_ack = 0;
 		inject = 1;
 	}
@@ -317,10 +319,10 @@ static enum hrtimer_restart pit_timer_fn(struct hrtimer *data)
 	struct kvm_kpit_state *ps = container_of(data, struct kvm_kpit_state, timer);
 	struct kvm_pit *pt = ps->kvm->arch.vpit;
 
-	if (ps->reinject || !atomic_read(&ps->pending)) {
+	if (ps->reinject)
 		atomic_inc(&ps->pending);
-		queue_kthread_work(&pt->worker, &pt->expired);
-	}
+
+	queue_kthread_work(&pt->worker, &pt->expired);
 
 	if (ps->is_periodic) {
 		hrtimer_add_expires_ns(&ps->timer, ps->period);
-- 
2.7.1

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ