linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/2] proc: Add /proc/<pid>/timerslack

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20160217130756.677dec32d6a6de0140ee022d@linux-foundation.org>
Date:	Wed, 17 Feb 2016 13:07:56 -0800
From:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>
Cc:	Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...ux.intel.com>,
	lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Oren Laadan <orenl@...lrox.com>,
	Ruchi Kandoi <kandoiruchi@...gle.com>,
	Rom Lemarchand <romlem@...roid.com>,
	Android Kernel Team <kernel-team@...roid.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] proc: Add /proc/<pid>/timerslack_ns interface

On Wed, 17 Feb 2016 12:51:17 -0800 John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org> wrote:

> Andrew: I saw you added these to -mm already. Would you prefer a fixup
> patch ontop, or should I just send out a folded down v3 of the
> patchset?

I'm OK with either.  I usually turn replacements into deltas so that
I (and others) can see what changed.  But it can become a bit unwieldy.