linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 4.3 000/200] 4.3.6-stable review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <56C53724.7010605@osg.samsung.com>
Date:	Wed, 17 Feb 2016 20:14:44 -0700
From:	Shuah Khan <shuahkh@....samsung.com>
To:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux@...ck-us.net,
	shuah.kh@...sung.com, patches@...nelci.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
	Shuah Khan <shuahkh@....samsung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.3 000/200] 4.3.6-stable review

On 02/17/2016 01:41 PM, Shuah Khan wrote:
> On 02/17/2016 01:39 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
>> On Mon, Feb 15, 2016 at 10:11:31AM -0700, Shuah Khan wrote:
>>> On 02/15/2016 08:16 AM, Shuah Khan wrote:
>>>> On 02/14/2016 03:20 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
>>>>> -------------------------
>>>>> NOTE: This is the last 4.3.y kernel to be released.  After this one, it
>>>>> is end-of-life, please move to 4.4.y at this point in time.
>>>>> -------------------------
>>>>>
>>>>> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.3.6 release.
>>>>> There are 200 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
>>>>> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
>>>>> let me know.
>>>>>
>>>>> Responses should be made by Tue Feb 16 22:21:48 UTC 2016.
>>>>> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>>>>>
>>>>> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
>>>>> 	kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v4.x/stable-review/patch-4.3.6-rc1.gz
>>>>> and the diffstat can be found below.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Compiled fine. I am seeing the following depmod warnings.
>>>> Something missing??
>>>>
>>>
>>> Didn't boot on my test system. Unfortunately
>>> I won't be able to debug this until Wednesday.
>>
>> Were you able to determine what went wrong here?
>>
> 
> This is also on the same system. I am hoping 3.10
> failure and this one are the same :) That is the
> next on the list.
> 

Hi Greg,

Please remove the following commit:

Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
    tracing/stacktrace: Show entire trace if passed in function not found

This seems to an incomplete backport to 4.3.6 from 4.5

  CC      kernel/trace/trace_stack.o
kernel/trace/trace_stack.c: In function ‘check_stack’:
kernel/trace/trace_stack.c:126:11: error: ‘stack_trace_max’ undeclared (first use in this function)
  if (i == stack_trace_max.nr_entries)
           ^
kernel/trace/trace_stack.c:126:11: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in
scripts/Makefile.build:258: recipe for target 'kernel/trace/trace_stack.o' failed
make[2]: *** [kernel/trace/trace_stack.o] Error 1
scripts/Makefile.build:403: recipe for target 'kernel/trace' failed
make[1]: *** [kernel/trace] Error 2
Makefile:941: recipe for target 'kernel' failed
make: *** [kernel] Error 2

Without kernel/trace/trace_stack.c change everything
works fine.

thanks,
-- Shuah

-- 
Shuah Khan
Sr. Linux Kernel Developer
Open Source Innovation Group
Samsung Research America (Silicon Valley)
shuahkh@....samsung.com | (970) 217-8978