lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2016 20:14:44 -0700 From: Shuah Khan <shuahkh@....samsung.com> To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux@...ck-us.net, shuah.kh@...sung.com, patches@...nelci.org, stable@...r.kernel.org, Shuah Khan <shuahkh@....samsung.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.3 000/200] 4.3.6-stable review On 02/17/2016 01:41 PM, Shuah Khan wrote: > On 02/17/2016 01:39 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: >> On Mon, Feb 15, 2016 at 10:11:31AM -0700, Shuah Khan wrote: >>> On 02/15/2016 08:16 AM, Shuah Khan wrote: >>>> On 02/14/2016 03:20 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: >>>>> ------------------------- >>>>> NOTE: This is the last 4.3.y kernel to be released. After this one, it >>>>> is end-of-life, please move to 4.4.y at this point in time. >>>>> ------------------------- >>>>> >>>>> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.3.6 release. >>>>> There are 200 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response >>>>> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please >>>>> let me know. >>>>> >>>>> Responses should be made by Tue Feb 16 22:21:48 UTC 2016. >>>>> Anything received after that time might be too late. >>>>> >>>>> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: >>>>> kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v4.x/stable-review/patch-4.3.6-rc1.gz >>>>> and the diffstat can be found below. >>>>> >>>> >>>> Compiled fine. I am seeing the following depmod warnings. >>>> Something missing?? >>>> >>> >>> Didn't boot on my test system. Unfortunately >>> I won't be able to debug this until Wednesday. >> >> Were you able to determine what went wrong here? >> > > This is also on the same system. I am hoping 3.10 > failure and this one are the same :) That is the > next on the list. > Hi Greg, Please remove the following commit: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org> tracing/stacktrace: Show entire trace if passed in function not found This seems to an incomplete backport to 4.3.6 from 4.5 CC kernel/trace/trace_stack.o kernel/trace/trace_stack.c: In function ‘check_stack’: kernel/trace/trace_stack.c:126:11: error: ‘stack_trace_max’ undeclared (first use in this function) if (i == stack_trace_max.nr_entries) ^ kernel/trace/trace_stack.c:126:11: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in scripts/Makefile.build:258: recipe for target 'kernel/trace/trace_stack.o' failed make[2]: *** [kernel/trace/trace_stack.o] Error 1 scripts/Makefile.build:403: recipe for target 'kernel/trace' failed make[1]: *** [kernel/trace] Error 2 Makefile:941: recipe for target 'kernel' failed make: *** [kernel] Error 2 Without kernel/trace/trace_stack.c change everything works fine. thanks, -- Shuah -- Shuah Khan Sr. Linux Kernel Developer Open Source Innovation Group Samsung Research America (Silicon Valley) shuahkh@....samsung.com | (970) 217-8978
Powered by blists - more mailing lists