linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/12] cpufreq: governor: Move io_is_busy to struct dbs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20160218052850.GH2610@vireshk-i7>
Date:	Thu, 18 Feb 2016 10:58:50 +0530
From:	Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
Cc:	Linux PM list <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/12] cpufreq: governor: Move io_is_busy to struct
 dbs_data

On 18-02-16, 02:20, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
> 
> The io_is_busy governor tunable is only used by the ondemand governor
> and is located in the ondemand-specific data structure, but it is
> looked at by the common governor code that has to do ugly things to
> get to that value, so move it to struct dbs_data and modify ondemand
> accordingly.
> 
> Since the conservative governor never touches that field, it will
> be always 0 for that governor and it won't have any effect on the
> results of computations in that case.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
> ---
>  drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.c |   27 +++++++++------------------
>  drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.h |    2 +-
>  drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_ondemand.c |   12 +++++-------
>  3 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)

Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>

-- 
viresh