lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2016 10:58:50 +0530 From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org> To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net> Cc: Linux PM list <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>, Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/12] cpufreq: governor: Move io_is_busy to struct dbs_data On 18-02-16, 02:20, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com> > > The io_is_busy governor tunable is only used by the ondemand governor > and is located in the ondemand-specific data structure, but it is > looked at by the common governor code that has to do ugly things to > get to that value, so move it to struct dbs_data and modify ondemand > accordingly. > > Since the conservative governor never touches that field, it will > be always 0 for that governor and it won't have any effect on the > results of computations in that case. > > Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com> > --- > drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.c | 27 +++++++++------------------ > drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.h | 2 +- > drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_ondemand.c | 12 +++++------- > 3 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-) Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org> -- viresh
Powered by blists - more mailing lists