lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2016 11:14:42 +0530 From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org> To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net> Cc: Linux PM list <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>, Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/12] cpufreq: governor: Fix CPU load information updates via ->store On 18-02-16, 02:26, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > Index: linux-pm/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_ondemand.c > =================================================================== > --- linux-pm.orig/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_ondemand.c > +++ linux-pm/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_ondemand.c > @@ -29,6 +29,7 @@ > > static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct od_cpu_dbs_info_s, od_cpu_dbs_info); > > +static struct dbs_governor od_dbs_gov; > static struct od_ops od_ops; > > static unsigned int default_powersave_bias; > @@ -222,7 +223,6 @@ static ssize_t store_io_is_busy(struct d > { > unsigned int input; > int ret; > - unsigned int j; > > ret = sscanf(buf, "%u", &input); > if (ret != 1) > @@ -230,12 +230,8 @@ static ssize_t store_io_is_busy(struct d > dbs_data->io_is_busy = !!input; > > /* we need to re-evaluate prev_cpu_idle */ > - for_each_online_cpu(j) { > - struct od_cpu_dbs_info_s *dbs_info = &per_cpu(od_cpu_dbs_info, > - j); > - dbs_info->cdbs.prev_cpu_idle = get_cpu_idle_time(j, > - &dbs_info->cdbs.prev_cpu_wall, dbs_data->io_is_busy); > - } We weren't doing ignore_nice_load check here, but will be done after this patch. Will that make a different? And then this should be mentioned in the log as well ? Apart from that. Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org> -- viresh
Powered by blists - more mailing lists