lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Thu, 18 Feb 2016 06:31:14 -0200
From:	Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...radead.org>
To:	Russel Winder <russel@...der.org.uk>
Cc:	Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, linux-media@...r.kernel.org,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
	Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...ll.ch>,
	Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@...el.com>,
	Keith Packard <keithp@...thp.com>,
	Graham Whaley <graham.whaley@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: V4L docs and docbook

Em Thu, 18 Feb 2016 08:17:00 +0000
Russel Winder <russel@...der.org.uk> escreveu:

> On Wed, 2016-02-17 at 21:51 -0200, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> > […]
> > 
> > We have 2 types of documentation for the Kernel part of the
> > subsystem,
> > Both using DocBook:
> > - The uAPI documentation:
> > 	https://linuxtv.org/downloads/v4l-dvb-apis
> > - The kAPI documentation:
> > 	https://linuxtv.org/downloads/v4l-dvb-internals/device-drivers/
> > mediadev.html  
> […]
> 
> I may not be introducing new data here but…
> 
> Whilst ReStructuredText and Markdown are fairly popular text markup
> languages, they are not related to the DocBook/XML toolchain.
> 
> Many people, especially authors of books etc. are not really willing to
> write in DocBook/XML even though it is the re-purposable representation
> of choice for most of the major publishers. This led to ASCIIDoc.
> 
> ASCIIDoc is a plain text markup language in the same way
> ReStructuredText and Markdown are, but it's intention was always to be
> a lightweight front end to DocBook/XML so as to allow authors to write
> in a nice markup language but work with the DocBook/XML toolchain.
> 
> ASCIIDoc has gained quite a strong following. So much so that it now
> has a life of its own separate from the DocBook/XML tool chain. There
> is ASCIIDoctor which generates PDF, HTML,… from the source without
> using DocBook/XML, yet the source can quite happily go through a
> DocBook/XML toolchain as well.
> 
> Many of the open source projects I am involved with are now using
> ASCIIDoctor as the documentation form. This has increased the number of
> non-main-contributor contributions via pull requests. It is so much
> easier to work with ASCIIDoc(tor) source than DocBook/XML source. 

Are there any tools that would convert from DocBook to ASCIIDoc?

Thanks,
Mauro

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped

Powered by blists - more mailing lists