linux-kernel - [PATCH v2 3/6] rockchip: power-domain: add support for sub-power domains

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1455764838-12928-4-git-send-email-zhangqing@rock-chips.com>
Date:	Thu, 18 Feb 2016 11:07:15 +0800
From:	Elaine Zhang <zhangqing@...k-chips.com>
To:	heiko@...ech.de, wxt@...k-chips.com
Cc:	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, huangtao@...k-chips.com,
	zyw@...k-chips.com, xxx@...k-chips.com, jay.xu@...k-chips.com,
	linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Elaine Zhang <zhangqing@...k-chips.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 3/6] rockchip: power-domain: add support for sub-power domains

This patch adds support for making one power domain a sub-domain of
other domain. This is useful for modeling power dependences,
which needs to have more than one power domain enabled to be operational.

Signed-off-by: Elaine Zhang <zhangqing@...k-chips.com>
---
 drivers/soc/rockchip/pm_domains.c | 54 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 54 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/soc/rockchip/pm_domains.c b/drivers/soc/rockchip/pm_domains.c
index 350527b..8cdf1b2 100644
--- a/drivers/soc/rockchip/pm_domains.c
+++ b/drivers/soc/rockchip/pm_domains.c
@@ -372,6 +372,54 @@ static void rockchip_configure_pd_cnt(struct rockchip_pmu *pmu,
 	regmap_write(pmu->regmap, domain_reg_offset + 4, count);
 }
 
+static int rockchip_pm_add_subdomain(struct rockchip_pmu *pmu,
+				     struct device_node *parent)
+{
+	struct device_node *np;
+	int error;
+
+	for_each_child_of_node(parent, np) {
+		struct generic_pm_domain *child_domain, *parent_domain;
+		u32 idx = ~0;
+
+		if (of_property_read_u32(parent, "reg", &idx)) {
+			dev_err(pmu->dev,
+				"%s: failed to retrieve domain id (reg)\n",
+				parent->name);
+			of_node_put(parent);
+			return -EINVAL;
+		}
+		parent_domain = pmu->genpd_data.domains[idx];
+
+		error = rockchip_pm_add_one_domain(pmu, np);
+		if (error) {
+			dev_err(pmu->dev, "failed to handle node %s: %d\n",
+				np->name, error);
+			of_node_put(np);
+			return -ENODEV;
+		}
+
+		if (of_property_read_u32(np, "reg", &idx)) {
+			dev_err(pmu->dev,
+				"%s: failed to retrieve domain id (reg)\n",
+				np->name);
+			of_node_put(np);
+			return -EINVAL;
+		}
+		child_domain = pmu->genpd_data.domains[idx];
+
+		if (pm_genpd_add_subdomain(parent_domain, child_domain))
+			pr_warn("%s failed to add subdomain: %s\n",
+				parent_domain->name, child_domain->name);
+		else
+			pr_warn("%s add subdomain: %s\n",
+				parent_domain->name, child_domain->name);
+
+		rockchip_pm_add_subdomain(pmu, np);
+	}
+	return 0;
+}
+
 static int rockchip_pm_domain_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 {
 	struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
@@ -437,6 +485,12 @@ static int rockchip_pm_domain_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 				node->name, error);
 			goto err_out;
 		}
+		error = rockchip_pm_add_subdomain(pmu, node);
+		if (error < 0) {
+			dev_err(dev, "failed to handle subdomain node %s: %d\n",
+				node->name, error);
+			goto err_out;
+		}
 	}
 
 	if (error) {
-- 
1.9.1