[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160218102959.GD3694@pd.tnic>
Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2016 11:29:59 +0100
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 3/4] x86, mce: Add __mcsafe_copy()
On Thu, Feb 18, 2016 at 09:21:07AM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > +#ifndef CONFIG_UML
>
> Why is this UML quirk needed? No other memcpy functions have it. Theoretically UML
> could introduce the notion of #MC interruption.
https://lkml.kernel.org/r/56B7AEEE.5070504@nod.at
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
ECO tip #101: Trim your mails when you reply.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists