[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1592265.QLnTJA45ZD@vostro.rjw.lan>
Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2016 02:19 +0100
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
To: Linux PM list <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
Subject: [PATCH 1/12] cpufreq: governor: Close dbs_data update race condition
From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
It is possible for a dbs_data object to be updated after its
usage counter has become 0. That may happen if governor_store()
runs (via a govenor tunable sysfs attribute write) in parallel
with cpufreq_governor_exit() called for the last cpufreq policy
associated with the dbs_data in question. In that case, if
governor_store() acquires dbs_data->mutex right after
cpufreq_governor_exit() has released it, the ->store() callback
invoked by it may operate on dbs_data with no users. Although
sysfs will cause the kobject_put() in cpufreq_governor_exit() to
block until governor_store() has returned, that situation may
lead to some unexpected results, depending on the implementation
of the ->store callback, and therefore it should be avoided.
To that end, modify governor_store() to check the dbs_data's
usage count before invoking the ->store() callback and return
an error if it is 0 at that point.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
---
drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
Index: linux-pm/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.c
===================================================================
--- linux-pm.orig/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.c
+++ linux-pm/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.c
@@ -112,7 +112,7 @@ static ssize_t governor_store(struct kob
mutex_lock(&dbs_data->mutex);
- if (gattr->store)
+ if (dbs_data->usage_count && gattr->store)
ret = gattr->store(dbs_data, buf, count);
mutex_unlock(&dbs_data->mutex);
Powered by blists - more mailing lists