lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2016 08:13:59 -0800 From: Stefan Agner <stefan@...er.ch> To: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com> Cc: jiang.liu@...ux.intel.com, Sanchayan Maity <maitysanchayan@...il.com>, robh@...nel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: no irq domain found for ... a GPIO interrupt controller Hi Marc, On 2016-02-18 01:14, Marc Zyngier wrote: <snip> > What your stack trace shows is that the failure occurs at boot time, > when of_platform_populate() parses the DT and creates the platform > devices. As part of this process, it tries to resolves the interrupt > specifiers, but fails to do so for this particular device, since the > corresponding irqchip and domain have not been created yet (the GPIO > controller is itself a device, while other irqchips are not). > > But as long as your device driver uses platform_get_irq(), you will > force the interrupt specifier to be evaluated again, this time giving > you a valid interrupt (and provided that your GPIO driver has > initialized in the meantime - check for -EPROBE_DEFER). At some point, > we'll be able to kill the interrupt resolution from > of_platform_populate(). The device driver is using platform_get_irq. However, I think it currently would not handle EPROBE_DEFER right, but seems also not to happen in practice... > > To summarize, your driver not working may not be related to this issue. So this means that despite the warning, nothing I really need to worry right? Does this warning will go away in the future? -- Stefan
Powered by blists - more mailing lists